On Friday 27 June 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > But wouldn't you fix the same bugs and retain backward compatibility > with allowing empty package lists? Or are there specific bugs that > relate to an empty package list? > > I'm all for fixing bugs but also for keeping existing scripts working > where possible.
Not if the fact that options were previously accepted was a bug... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
