On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Paul Menzel wrote: > Would you have minded, if I had added this and updated it today?
Yes, for the following reasons: 1) it is only likely to confuse other users 2) the breakage is mostly completely outside our control 3) listings would be highly unreliable because of the turnover speed of unstabe (we'd miss most issues and run the risk of issues not getting cleaned up when the are resolved) 4) installing sid directly really isn't that good an idea and _always_ has the risk of failure attached; just don't do it if you're unprepared to deal that > the system did not boot anymore – it did not ask for the passphrase as > before (both linux images failed (2.6.22 (updated) and 2.6.24 > (installed)). (I did not look at /etc/crypttab after the dist-upgrade. > But it should not have changed.) That's a known issue with busybox that would also have hit you if you'd installed sid directly. Again more a reason to _not_ install sid directly than anything else. Downgrading busybox and rebuilding your initrd should fix it. Cheers, FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.