On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:43:43PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 07:31:55PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Friday 29 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:18:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > >> > * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-25 23:44]: > > >> > > This patch adds -versatile flavour to linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 > > >> > > > >> > This patch seems to miss an update to the package-list file. You can > > >> > use the package-list file to specify that this kernel provides ext2 > > >> > and other modules (i.e. that they are built-in). > > >> > > >> Thanks. Fixed and committed. > > > > > > Where exactly did anybody give an OK for this to be committed by you? > > > > > > I would say that the comments were at most an invitation to prepare a new > > > patch and submit that for review again. > > > > > > Another example is the commit you did to the manual. You asked for > > > review, > > > but then used a minor comment from someone who's himself not actually > > > part > > > of the team as a justification to commit the change. It would have been > > > much nicer if you'd left a bit more time for the actual maintainers of > > > the > > > manual to respond (especially when you know people are away at a > > > conference). After you already committed I myself no longer saw any point > > > in commenting, so I didn't. I will now probably just rewrite the text if > > > I > > > see a reason to do so. > > > > > > I really totally disagree with the way you appropriate things and am even > > > at > > > this point starting to consider whether your commit access to the D-I SVN > > > repository should just be revoked. > > > > While I fully agree with your complains and also think that Robert > > should really be more careful in the future I also think that we all > > do mistakes and learn from them. > > > > He has been very active and tries to make things go fast (as I also do > > mistakenly sometimes) however this doesn't justify his commit right > > removal. > > > > Mistakes are far from usual misbehaviour and I'm sure Robert will do > > his best to avoid this to happen again. Am I right Robert? > > Hey, > > Sorry, I missunderstood. Please, would you tell me which specific rules I > should observe for each part of D-I? I understand I can handle win32-loader/ > directory freely, but for the rest I really don't know, and was just using > common sense.
Alternatively, if you can setup ACLs that would restrict my commit rights to win32-loader/ directory, I would feel comfortable with that. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
