On Thursday 07 February 2008, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I raised this issue on #debian-boot (irc), and was told that the > > concerns by "(a d-i maintainer | someone who was willing to express an > > opinion" were correct. Frans Pop from the debian-installer team > > verified that the Homepage field should not be included in the udeb: > > Yes, makes sense. I've just fixed it in dpkg's git [0].
Thanks Guillem.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
