On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Praveen A wrote: > 2008/1/10, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My understanding was that you were proposing to strip out unused > > glyphs from the supported languages. For instance, if a given glyph is > > not used by Amharic translations, it would be removed. > > > > *that*, I would object to..... > > What about the conjuncts (combination of basic characters which does not > have a unicode code point) that comes in the private area of the font?
Can you give specific examples please?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
