On Thursday 14 June 2007 10:46, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > yep, that's correct: after etch r0, something has changed in gcc and > now libgcc.so.1 is required also by i386 images ( and possibly ppc ): i > think the EXTRAFILES workaround should be applied to i386 and ppc in > the etch branch of the installer (see my yesterday's reply to #427657)
Why should it be applied in the Etch branch if the issue only affects daily images? Or am I missing something here? It has already been fixed for daily images.
pgpxx9gi7ViBa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
