On Feb 12, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Will udev add this new rule to
> /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules ? Since no new rules are
Yes, this is the whole point.

> being added on my test system, does this tells whether something like
> DRIVERS=="?*" is matching or not ?
Apparently not. I see that I already suggested this in my first
reply on december 14.

> It seems that the real question is what sequence of events causes an
> interface to be named eth1_rename, as opposed to the next available
> interface name (e.g. eth1). I'll see if I can figure this out from the
I explained this today.
I do not think I can help you further if you ignore what I write.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to