On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's an even better approach than chvt'ing to VT2 and then back by hand. > Is this something we want to have for Etch ?
That would be nice, but not strictly necessary. If I got it well, g-i won't be the official frontend for d-i for etch. But that's for you d-i guys to decide on that ;) > >Having a console widget in the gtk frontend would be neat. > > > > Yep, and even useful for other purposes when gtk/dfb is used. > Is this something we want to definitely put efforts on for Lenny? This is definitely something I'd be interested in working on, if I have enough time for that. But I can't tell for sure if I'll have this time. I've been hacking d-i to create a bootable cd for some other purpose at work and got interested in d-i. So if I get time between etch and lenny, you'll probably hear from me again. > >>Finally, should this bug be merged with 339855 (cc'ed)? > > > > > >Sounds reasonable. > > I see 408437 has a patch, so letting frans decide whether to do this or not. 339855 has your patch, 408437 has none... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
