On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > > This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might > > > be adaptable, the PAE migration of i386 Xen is not. But we need this > > > change as a workaround for #399113, otherwise the i386 Xen kernels will > > > be broken in the release, and require an immediate update. > > > And since we are already planning an ABI bump, we can add the missing > > > changeset of 2.6.18.5, too. > > > > The first two ABI changes are specific to extra kernel flavors that > > aren't relevant to the installer and have few (if any?) extra modules > > built for them. > > Actually, quite a few modules packages are being built for the > vserver and xen flavours : > > main: > spca5xx (linux-modules-extra-2.6) > redhat-cluster (linux-modules-extra-2.6) > squashfs (linux-modules-extra-2.6) > loop-aes (loop-aes) > > contrib: > ipw2100 (linux-modules-contrib-2.6) > ipw2200 (linux-modules-contrib-2.6) > ipw3945 (linux-modules-contrib-2.6) > > non-free: > kqemu (linux-modules-nonfree-2.6) > > Unless I missed some, I think this concerns four source packages. > I'm not sure if it would be possible to binNMU / force rebuild of > those, but since linux-modules-* are maintained by the kernel team > and loop-aes by myself, I think we could react quickly and rebuild > them via normal sourceful uploads as well.
Why is loop-aes not part of the official module packages ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
