Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe the installer kernel would have the release version on the
>> package name and then it wouldn't be remove from the suite until the
>> next version. e.g:
>>
>> - linux-image-d-i-4.0-rc1
>
> So you prefer ugly hacked solution over cleant and neat ones ?
>
>> It would make sure that all udebs would be available until we move
>> the:
>>
>> - linux-image-d-i-4.0-rc2
>>
>> or
>>
>> - linux-image-d-i-4.0-release
>
> Yeah. You know we stopped doing this kind of stuff for the kernel package over
> a year ago, and probably for a reason, don't you think ?
We stopped doing that for kernel packages. The problem here is that,
without doing that the binaries will stay but without source
code... that will be a GPL violation AFAIK.
Or I didn't understand what you're proposing or I don't think your
problem will source the GPL violation of lack of source code of
binaries. That's what I don't think it'll solve.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
