On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where > libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during > reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they > are needed by .udebs loaded later on. > > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something > such.
If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't need anything else in the package besides the executable. But I don't think d-i does what you describe (since I tried to use this approach for strace recently, and there were missing symbols in libc.so.6). If someone more familiar with d-i than I am can confirm that the udeb will be useful, I can try to get GDB to build one, but it seems like a very strange package to have a udeb. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
