(Please always delete text from the mail you reply to that is not relevant for your reply. And please limit such a discussion to only the relevant mailing list, i.e. d-boot; AFAIK Loïc reads d-boot, so not CC'ing him.)
On Sunday 08 October 2006 20:33, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > In the latter case, we should perform a from scratch backport of the > gtkdfb backend found in current GTK 2.10 CVS to 2.8.20. > In the case a clean backport should be overcomplicated (i failed in > this some weeks ago), would this be a valid reason to switch to a clean > GTK 2.10.x set of libs for the d-i only? No, this is not an option. The _only_ option we have now that the GNOME team have made their decision is to use 2.8.x. That is exactly why I wrote that paragraph. Great news that there is progress.
pgpJmaX65D8qW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
