On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 07:03:39PM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > Sven Luther schrieb: > >On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > >>df_dok is 69K, but it also requires some images and loaders for PNG, > >>JPEG, GIF, TTF. > > > >Well, the images and loaders are most probably already present on the > >ramdisk > >anyway. Those we care about at least ? > > The loaders probably, but not the images for the example program.
Does it need to be special examples, or would the graphical installer images do ? > >>So for simple graphics tests, as dfbinfo has no graphics, df_dok would > >>be a huge "next step". You could use df_particle, which doesn't load any > >>font or image, doesn't require additional DirectFB modules and is just > >>5.7K here in binary size. Unfortunately, it uses a lot of floating point > >>and sin/cos IIRC. > > > >So, at most we are speaking about a 100KB of binaries, and maybe 20KB if we > >only go for df_particle ? Compared to a 10+ GB ramdisk, this is peanuts. > > > >Are df_particle and df_dok in the same tarball as the main directfb stuff ? > >the debian libdirectfb-bin .deb package has only the dfb* binaries. > > df_dok and df_particle are part of DirectFB-examples. ah, so probably not yet packaged. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
