On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:54:49AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > ifconfig is indeed provided by busybox in D-I. And, as a consequence, > it does not implement all the features of the real ifconfig. > > The question then becomes: it this a vital feature for it to be > implemented in busybox's ifconfig?
The original poster did not provide his use case. Hence my request for elaborating the need for ifconfig eth0 ether MAC-ADDRESS Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
