reassign 388159 installation-reports retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci severity wishlist thanks
Rick Thomas wrote: > Package: base Please do not file bugs against the base pseudo-package. It is there just as a catch-all-I-dunno-where-to-file-this-report for users that can't really tell what package is giving them problems. All the bug reports here get reassigned to the right package. > > On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote: > > > > Frans Pop a écrit : > > > > > The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base > > > > > system and what is not. > > > > > > Then who is? Where should I send a bug report? > > > > What is your rationale for including it? > > lspci is hardly an essential tool (although it _is_ highly useful of > > course, but so are a couple of 100 other tools that are not > > included)... > > > > Correct place to file a bug report would be the pseudo package > > "base", but I strongly suggest you do not file a bug for this. Wrong, see above. > Since the install-report template requests the output of lspci, I > would think you -- of all folks -- would want it as part of the base > system. Imho, installation-reports should depend on, or recommend lspci if it requires its output for the report. Thanks -- ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' : -- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
