Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 10:35, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Does anyone has comments about it?
>
> (Ignoring the debug stuff which was already removed in a later version of
> the patch.)
>
> This patch gives me the feeling that functionality is being added because
> it is possible, not because it is really needed. IMO there this patch at
> least adds a certain amount of redundancy.
>
> I can understand the desire for a specific debootstrap script, but I feel
> adding support for _preseeding_ INCLUDES and EXCLUDES is redundant,
> especially when targeted at CDDs:
> - CDDs should be able to use the include and exclude files instead of
> preseeding;
That forces them to use CD installation.
> - includes and excludes may not even be needed anymore now that you can
> use a completely tailored debootstrap script instead;
That will force us to change debootstrap script and that can be
workarounded using included/excludes most of time.
> - Colin recently already added the option to preseed installation of extra
> packages in pkgsel (pkgsel/include), which is a much more safe place
> to install additional packages.
include and excludes aren't extra packages but packages providing base
functionality. For example the use of nullmailer on desktop machines
instead of exim4.
> For the debootstrap script, I wonder if that really needs to be
> preseedable or if it would be better to have base-installer look for a
> script with a fixed name in a fixed place. It is only really of use to
> people who will probably already be creating their own images.
I didn't see what you mean here.
> IMO with all these different options to include, exclude, customize, etc.
> we are starting to run the risk of making d-i a maintenance and
> documentation hell and also of not being able to support people anymore
> who use these options incorrectly and thus create problems for
> themselves. Do we really want to make it this easy for people to mess
> with the base system installation?
Well. If someone uses it then he's in his own risk. IMHO we shouldn't
avoid the right of him to do that.
> Of course, others may disagree with me. I have no problem with that.
I do.
> If the option to preseed includes and excludes _is_ added, I suggest to
> make it so that both comma and space separated lists are accepted (see
> Colin's implementation of pkgsel/include).
Sure. I can improve it besides yestarday Joey comments too :-D
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
