maximilian attems wrote: [snip] > > No, it is not. As you may have noticed, we had a release update a few > > days ago, telling people that we're currently planning to release with > > 2.6.17. Though we're aware that it might be needed to update the kernel > > in October, the current upstream release quality is not something we > > want to rely on. > > the last announcement by the release team was coordinated with d-kernel > and said 2.6.17 or higher. > also if you look at the mails of fjp and aba, they all state that the > Sarge Debian kernel freeze was too long and if things get coordinated > with d-i an newer kernel is fine. > > we are about to stabilize 2.6.17, although we won't backport 2.6.18 > stuff, as from the timing 2.6.18 looks good. 2.6.18 has features for > several archs ppc, amd64 (smp alternatives), sparc (sbus sysfs) plus > big sata/acpi merge.
AFAIU you on IRC we agreed to keep 2.6.17 with the necessary backports as a plan B release candidate. Did I misunderstand you, or did you change your mind? Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
