On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:51:05PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-15 00:53]: > > Because of recent changed I did (that haven't been commited yet), > > ntpdate now depends on libcrypto, so the ntpdate-udeb would end > > up with a dependency on libcrypto0.9.8-udeb. I hope that's not a > > problem? > > Is this libcrypto dependency strictly needed (what for) or could the > udeb be built in a way that it's needed? libcrypto0.9.8-udeb appears > to be about a meg in size while ntpdate has less than 50K.
There was an internal version of md5 that has a license problem so was removed. Since we already link to libcrypto, I replaced the md5 code by calling the functions from libcrypto which are compatible. Maybe we can link ntpdate-udeb staticly to libcrypto? That should reduce the size. Initial test shows that for current version of the normal ntpdate: -rwxr-xr-x 1 kurt kurt 226297 Jul 15 19:41 ntpdate Installed-Size: 184 And linked staticly to libcrypto: -rwxr-xr-x 1 kurt kurt 230536 Jul 15 19:40 ntpdate Installed-Size: 188 And the dependency on libssl is removed. So this looks like something that could work. Some other change you should probably be aware of is that we have a dependency on netbase now because we need /etc/services. Is there something else we need to depend on for the udeb, or can we depend on netbase? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
