Joey Hess wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Write the changes to disks?
[ ] Write the changes to disks?
A simple correction for now could be to just not repeat the question:
Write the changes to disks?
[ ] Yes.
I agree with you and this can be easily done, as cdebconf package
provides debconf/button-yes and debconf/button-no templates.
Does anyonne see any possible problem that could arise with the "yes/no"
approach ?
Why not just:
[ ] Write the changes to disks?
This cold be easily implemented by not displaying the boolean question's
description above it, like this
Question's extended description
[ ] Question's description
Or, if you're going to use the button-* strings, why not use buttons:
White the changes to disks? [yes] [no]
This is a little less clean: the general approach in the GTK frontend is
delegating to [back] and [forward] buttons only returning from
frontend_go().
friendly
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
