On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:58:00PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > >On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:16:53PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > > > >>On 5/26/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Josselin Mouette wrote: > >>> > >>>>I support this patch requires newer directfb and cairo packages, are > >>>>these packages available somewhere? > >>> > >>>DirectFB 0.9.24 is already packaged as binary udeb, reular deb and > >>>development dev packaged. > >>>Right now, cairo is the real problem: currently its official maintainer, > >>>dave beckett is busy and i doubt he'll be able to provide us a binary > >>>deb compiled against DFB 0.9.24. > >> > >>Is this case fit for a binnmu for cairo? does it only need to be built > >>against the new DFB, or does it need some updates? > > > > > >I have not looked, but my guess is that it needs some modifications to > >produce > >the DFB-friendly packages. Unless cairo can be built with the dfb support > >and > >still work for the other targets ? > > i just mailed dave beckett, maintainer of libcairo2, to ask him if he > can provide us a DFB version of this libray.
Would the right thing not be to file a bug report, so that it can serve as base to track this issue ? And maybe someone can append a patch later on or something ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
