Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 09:09 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > If we decide that 2.9+ and 2.10 is the way to go for etch, then we should be > pro-active for this, and start experimenting, and even making them the default > NOW.
GTK 2.9 is GNOME 2.16 material, lot of packages Depends on GTK and making a "start of unstable cycle version" the default is not a good idea > It is scheduled for release during may, which may or not be delayed a bit. > This is way this is an important point to get feedaback from the release team > and from the gtk-gnome team now. I am CCing them on this. First tarball are due during may (ie: 2.9.n), not 2.10 > If they decide to not go with 2.10 for etch, then having a random 2.9 snapshot > or a final 2.10 package just for us would be no worse than the current 2.0.x > packages that we have today. I disagree, they is a lot of changes and new features for 2.10 and "a random 2.9 snapshot" is not something we are wanting to ship with a stable Debian Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
