On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:36:56AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 08:11, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Eh, if you want to do gtk-dfb, you can't. The choice between using the > > DirectFB backend or the X11 backend has to be done at compile time. Or > > am I missing something? > > No, you're not. This is an issue and it's going to take some advanced > library packaging knowledge to figure it out. > > However, I do know that it is possible set up the build system to compile > the udeb with a different config than the debs. The question is if you > can do that based on the regular lib and lib-dev packages.
My point really was that it's silly to drop the graphical installer as a target for Etch if you need to compile differently for gtk-dfb anyway; so if the regular gtk2 packages aren't at the correct version, having a different gtk2 source package which compiles the .udeb (and nothing more--unless you need some -dev packages to be able to build the installer image) would seem to be the obvious solution. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
