On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:15:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > What I'm saying is that no amout of proof that they will not be able > > > to meet the targets is relevant. What's relevant is actual failure to > > > do so, not your (or anyone else's) prognostications. > > > > the d-i isos are broken, and had i not been there, they will probably have > > been broken for another couple of month. > > As it happens, Frans had already noticed the problem and pinged me about > it a few days ago, and I was just emerging from under a different pile > of work so I had some time to look at it anyway. Failures in the d-i > build logs don't go unnoticed, although I agree that this one took > longer to fix than it should have done.
But nobody cared to inform the powerpc users, who where trying to use the broken images on machines the april 1 build could not work. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
