Frans Pop wrote:
The severities critical, grave and serious are intended to be used _only_
for issues that are Release Critical.
First is the definition of severities on
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities, 'Release Critical' is
another problem.
That is: if they are not fixed, the
next release of Debian should be postponed.
Yes, makes sense.
Do you really think this qualifies?
Yes.
Please...
... imagine the release of a distribution which ends in black screens
for wide spread graphic cards.
The configurator could fall back to 'vesa', as AFAIR Sarge did on my
notebook with an ATI 9700 (or I did it by manually editing?).
No, it is not unusable. The system works fine, it is just one loasy
program on it that does not work because it is not configured correctly.
Impact for the user: high (depending on his proficiency with Linux);
impact for the system: null.
It makes unrelated software on the system break, (critical)
OR at a minimum
It has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering
it completely unusable to everyone. (important)
IMHO it's a bug. But maybe against the wrong package. IMHO you should
direct it to the correct package. Closing 'unsolved' is not a solution.
Helmut Wollmersdorfer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
