On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:48 +0200, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > udeb definition, and there is no need for D-I to have such a huge > sledge hammer in order to break the tiny (vaporware) issue of game > loading
Indulge me another moment, and then I'll shut up. Aren't we just talking about one package header vs. another? I just don't see the point in a new "X-" header just to flag this one aspect of game packages that could just as easily be implemented as a tag. Or if it is a "sledgehammer" as you say, I still wonder even if the "X-" header is the most efficient implementation from D-I's perspective, if those headers should be defined in terms of some debtags classification. I think that's more consistent from the user's perspective. (I'm assuming a user might care about locating the subset of packages flagged as D-I game material outside of the context of doing an actual install. But maybe I'm totally off-base.) Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
