Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line LILO+XFS new behaviour
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 20:14:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 13:14:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-203-027-014.paemt7003.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br (localhost)
[200.203.27.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUtAp-00005v-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 13:14:19 -0700
Received: from marga by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BUtAg-0000QX-0S
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 31 May 2004 17:14:10 -0300
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 17:14:09 -0300
From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lilo+XFS do not work if installing on the partition.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was with Noodles, testing the netboot installer on his laptop. We
wanted to try something fancy, so we installed in a certain partition he
had free, formatting it in XFS. The idea was not to touch the rest of
the installation that he had in his notebook.
So, we did format in xfs, thinking of booting with lilo instead of grub.
Now, I think I already said this, but since grub does not work with XFS
in /, it would be nice if the installer would NOT try to install grub in
/, and switch automatically to lilo. Or at least, switch automatically
to the main menu.
Anyway, that's not the bug. The bug is that when installed in the
partition (instead of the drive's MBR) lilo does not work with XFS
either, it fails because it would break the file system. Apparently,
XFS does not leave space for lilo to be installed at the beginning of
the partition.
Actually, it didn't even fail. It stalled, and we had to go to the
console, kill the present lilo, do it by hand, and that's how we saw the
error message.
So, uhm, I see no solution here except for not letting the user do this.
Or at least, failing instead of stalling, so that the user can go back
and decide what to do.
--
Love,
Marga.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251944-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 19:46:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 11:46:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (erwin.amadeus) [200.115.206.87]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CXm2u-0001v4-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:46:21 -0800
Received: from ulises.amadeus
([192.168.21.15] helo=ulises.home ident=mail)
by erwin.amadeus with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CXm2u-0005ru-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:20 -0300
Received: from marga by ulises.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CXm2m-0006E9-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300
From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LILO+XFS new behaviour
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
I've just tried installing Debian with RC2 into an XFS partition.
It correctly chose to use LILO automatically instead of suggesting GRUB
first. And then when I chose to install it in the partition instead of the
mbr, it correctly warned me about the bad consequences it could have.
When I still chose to go on with this, it failed with a red screen and made
me go back until I chose to install LILO at the MBR.
I think this is as good as it gets, so I'm considering this bug solved, and
thus I'm closing it.
--
Besos, ,''`.
Marga : :' :
`. `'
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
