On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:39:26AM +0100, GISQUET Christophe wrote: > D'oh, contradicts my reportbug title. Let me rephrase this: dhclient > requests a 192.168.0.X IP on its eth1 interface. Server is configured to > give 192.168.1.X IPs on its eth1 interface, and 192.168.0.X on its eth0 > interface. It accepts this request (see end of mail).
A DHCP-discover does not request any ip, it asks for one. Is it possible that the server have a lease for this mac? > > Please provide an example of the dhcp request and response packets. > > Sorry again, but I'm too unfamiliar with DHCP ports and tcpdump to > know how to dump those packets. tcpdump -ni $interface "udp port 67" > Once I noticed that it is 192.168.0.0 that replies, I've decided to check > the server's dnsmasq.conf: both interfaces had the mask 255.255.0.0. Could > this be the cause of the problem, and a misconfiguration only on the > server side? In such case, I doublely apology for falsely reporting that > and marking it as important. Both 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 is included in 192.168.0.0/16. Bastian -- Phasers locked on target, Captain.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
