Your message dated Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:43:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276912: Failed exim4-daemon-light dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2004 12:50:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 17 05:50:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.udag.de [62.146.33.70]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJAUZ-0006nD-00; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:50:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (popeline.udag.de [62.146.33.77])
by mail.udag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 107728291; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Olaf Mandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failed exim4-daemon-light dependency
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: So Okt 17 14:09:56 CEST 2004,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
uname -a: Linux PC03-153 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: So Okt 17 14:09:56 CEST 2004
Method:
How did you install? Test-Install into swap-partition of working linux.
Choose testing. Didn't complete base-install.
What did you boot off? USB-Stick (128MB Lexar Jumpdrive 1.20)
If network install, from where? ftp2.de.debian.org
Proxied? No
Machine: Dell OptiPlex GX270
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: IDE (P-ATA) /dev/hda5
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda5 * 4803+ 4857 55- 441756 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 4858+ 4864 7- 56196 82 Linux swap
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface
(rev 02)
0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82865G Integrated Graphics Device
(rev 02)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller
(rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev
02)0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 100
Storage Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB (ICH5) Serial ATA 150 Storage
Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97
Audio Controller (rev 02)
0000:01:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev
02)
lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02)
0000:00:02.0 0300: 8086:2572 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 0101: 8086:24d1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02)
0000:01:0c.0 0200: 8086:100e (rev 02)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
This was a retest of bug #256815. The error during partitioning is described
there (kernel used LVM with VG on a deleted physical partition). The problem
during install base system happened, after the partition-table was fixed.
I don't think, they are related.
During install, exim4-daemon-light can't be configured due to a missing
libgnutls11. This causes other packages to fail and in the end the install
to fail.
>From /var/log/messages:
-Snipp-
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4-daemon-light:
exim4-daemon-light depends on libgnutls11 (>= 1.0.16); however:
Package libgnutls11 is not installed.
dpkg: error processing exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
-Snipp-
Leaving out failed packages, but this is interesting:
-Snipp-
Setting up exim4-config (4.34-6) ...
Adding system-user for exim (v4)
/usr/sbin/exim4: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.11: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Invalid new configfile /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp
not installing /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp to
/var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated
dpkg: error processing exim4-config (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-Snipp-
Did the --configure of exim4-config start, even though the dependancies were
not satisfied??? Looking at
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp2.de.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-i386_Packages
shows, that it is not dependant on it, but calling apt-cache showpkg exim4-config
shows a dependancy on exim4-daemon-light (3 4.33). Which is right? Assuming
that the list is right, why does apt-cache show such a conflict as a dependancy?
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276912-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2004 20:43:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 17 13:43:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJHsP-0000KH-00; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:43:37 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F38AC171E33; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:43:35 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#276912: Failed exim4-daemon-light dependency
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 02:50:29PM +0200, Olaf Mandel wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> INSTALL REPORT=20
> Debian-installer-version: So Okt 17 14:09:56 CEST 2004, http://cdimage.=
debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-businesscard.i=
so http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/cur=
rent/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
> uname -a: Linux PC03-153 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 =
GNU/Linux
> Date: So Okt 17 14:09:56 CEST 2004
> Method:
> How did you install? Test-Install into swap-partition of working linux.
> Choose testing. Didn't complete base-install.
> What did you boot off? USB-Stick (128MB Lexar Jumpdrive 1.20)
> If network install, from where? ftp2.de.debian.org
> Proxied? No
> This was a retest of bug #256815. The error during partitioning is descri=
bed
> there (kernel used LVM with VG on a deleted physical partition). The prob=
lem
> during install base system happened, after the partition-table was fixed.
> I don't think, they are related.
> During install, exim4-daemon-light can't be configured due to a missing
> libgnutls11. This causes other packages to fail and in the end the install
> to fail.
> >From /var/log/messages:
> -Snipp-
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4-daemon-light:
> exim4-daemon-light depends on libgnutls11 (>=3D 1.0.16); however:
> Package libgnutls11 is not installed.
> dpkg: error processing exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
> dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
The RC1 build is no longer supported. Please use pre-RC2 or a daily
build instead.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBctl2KN6ufymYLloRAnVsAJ4vGTG2KSRXkjSa3g9FEI+vsAtfeQCdE6du
s5JZ5A0MMXfO0Ur5u5uuTxo=
=r6WI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
