Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:51:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240409: success report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 06:35:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 26 22:35:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-69-105-235-1.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net (moon.timocharis.com)
[69.105.235.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B77Pk-0006UI-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:35:28 -0800
Received: by moon.timocharis.com (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 334A414CC3; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:35:26 -0800
From: Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation-reports
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 3 100Mb iso, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: Fri Mar 26 22:25:10 PST 2004
Method: Boot from CD
Machine: Sony Vaio SR-17. CDROM via PCMCIA.
Processor: Pentium 3 700MHz
Memory: 192M
Root Device: PCMCIA CDROM (attempting to install to internal IDE)
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci: /bin/sh: lspci: not found
(I can run lspci from this system from a running distro, if desired)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD: [E]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Initial boot from the CD worked, but when it came time to autodetect
the CDROM for further installation, it failed.
I tried booting expert ide1=0x180,0x386 (also tried ide2=0x180,0x386),
which has worked in the past on this machine with other linux installers,
but that didn't help.
The "choose drivers" screen on the expert install didn't list any
pcmcia modules, only usb-storage, base ide and a lot of specific ide
controllers.
lsmod didn't list pcmcia or yenta, and modprobe pcmcia and modprobe
yenta-socket both failed, as did modprobe i82365 (suggested by
gravity on IRC). The error messages are the same except for mod name:
modprobe: failed to load module yenta-socket
insmod: yenta-socket.o: no module by that name found
There's no /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/pcmcia directory (there is
kernel/drivers and lots of stuff under that, but nothing matching
pcmcia* or yenta*).
(If we get this working, is there any chance we could add a listing
in the help for Sony CDROMs (ide1=0x180,0x386 or whatever turns out
to work?) Maybe I should file that as a separate RFE if I get that
far.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240409-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2004 04:09:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 14 21:09:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CIJOm-00027d-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:09:00 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDDE17DF7;
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:49:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 93A796E111; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:51:09 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#240409: success report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Akkana Peck wrote:
> I'm happy to report that with the netinst image from Oct. 13,=20
> PCMCIA initializes, and the installer finds the CDROM and
> successfully reads packages from it. I didn't proceed further
> to complete the install, but it looks like the PCMCIA CDROM
> problem has been solved.
Great, closing the report.
--=20
see shy jo
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBbzsdd8HHehbQuO8RAqvGAJsFExiwJoCP9tzogeNkR+5x4ht5ogCg6wIP
t7PnWBGPSPDsuwfIYnVpthI=
=ayoy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
