Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:00:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275843: Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 16:28:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 10 09:28:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CGgYn-0001qR-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:28:37 -0700
Received: from pcnp.pogt.dk (cpe.atm2-0-5295.0x50c5aa6e.arcnxx12.customer.tele.dk
[80.197.170.110])
by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337981EC3BE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:28:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Peder Chr. =?iso-8859-1?q?N=F8rgaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation report
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:28:36 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-09-30
downloaded from=20
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-ia=
64-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux pcnp 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Li=
nux
Date: 2004-10-07
Method: I burned the image to a CD and booted from that.
Network install was directly from ftp.dk.debian.org
Machine: Home-build PC, based on K7S8X, 3.0 motherboard
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Memory: 512 Mb Dane-Elec DDR3200
Root Device: IDE disk - Maxtor 6Y080L0 80 Gb
Root Size/partition table:=20
Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-78167.250 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags
1 0.031 38.390 primary ext3 /boot
2 38.391 19111.640 primary ntfs boot Windows XP sys=
tem
3 19111.641 33416.578 primary ext3 /
4 33424.299 78159.990 extended lba
5 33424.330 33902.797 logical linux-swap
6 33902.829 52979.985 logical ext3 /home
7 52980.016 78159.990 logical ext3 /reserve
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
cnp:~# lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 746 Host (rev 10)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SG86C202
0000:00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS963 [MuTIOL Me=
dia=20
IO] (rev 25)
0000:00:02.1 SMBus: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]: Unknown device 0016
0000:00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE]
0000:00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]=
=20
Sound Controller (rev a0)
0000:00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0=20
Controller (rev 0f)
0000:00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0=20
Controller (rev 0f)
0000:00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0=20
Controller
0000:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 P=
CI=20
=46ast Ethernet (rev 90)
0000:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8029(=
AS)
0000:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8029(=
AS)
0000:00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c325 [ViRGE] (rev 06)
0000:00:0c.0 Network controller: AIRONET Wireless Communications PC4800 (re=
v=20
01)
pcnp:~# lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 1039:0746 (rev 10)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 1039:0002
0000:00:02.0 0601: 1039:0963 (rev 25)
0000:00:02.1 0c05: 1039:0016
0000:00:02.5 0101: 1039:5513
0000:00:02.7 0401: 1039:7012 (rev a0)
0000:00:03.0 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
0000:00:03.1 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
0000:00:03.2 0c03: 1039:7002
0000:00:04.0 0200: 1039:0900 (rev 90)
0000:00:09.0 0200: 10ec:8029
0000:00:0a.0 0200: 10ec:8029
0000:00:0b.0 0300: 5333:5631 (rev 06)
0000:00:0c.0 0280: 14b9:0350 (rev 01)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
The installation exhibited three peculiarities. Nothing
serious (I think), but a bit strange.
P1) D-i asks for "Start PC Card services?" three times during the
process - one would be more reasonable. The three times are during
"Detect and mount CD-ROM", "Detect Network Hardware" and "Detect
Hardware", respectively.
P2) The four LAN cards have a different naming scheme
than under my old (very much updated, but currently
2.6.8 based) debian. Old scheme was
eth0 - Realtek PCI card A
eth1 - Realtek PCI card B
eth2 - Cisco Aironet (mounted on PCI board)
eth3 - the on-board connection
New scheme is
eth0 - the on-board connection
eth1 - Realtek PCI card A
eth2 - Realtek PCI card B
eth3 - Cisco Aironet (mounted on PCI board)
=2D the new naming scheme is *also* there when I
boot the installed disk!
Of course I had to tell d-i to choose "eth1" as "primary
network interface" - that's where the cable to the world
sits.
P3) The partitioning of the disk goes just fine under debian-installer
=2D but "parted" (running under the installed system) is not satisfied:
"Warning: Unable to align partition properly. This probably means that=20
another
partitioning tool generated an incorrect partition table, because it didn't=
=20
have
the correct BIOS geometry. It is safe to ignore,but ignoring may cause
(fixable) problems with some boot loaders."
How is it that d-i produces a partition table that parted thinks is incorre=
ct?
=2D-=20
Peder Chr. N=F8rgaard e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefionsvej 19 spejder-e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DK-8230 =C5byh=F8j tel: +45 87 44 11 99
Denmark mob: +45 30 91 84 31
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275843-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2004 04:01:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11 21:01:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CHDr2-0008Fc-00; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:01:40 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DAE184E3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:58:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0F7606E111; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:00:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:00:17 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#275843: Installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Peder Chr. N=F8rgaard wrote:
> > The 2.6 kernel reports disk geometry in a way that confused parted. This
> > should have been fixed in parted version 1.6.11-6. We use that version
> > in the installer, it's possible you installed an older version though.
>=20
> I do use parted 1.6.11-6. The message I cited is from parted 1.6.11-6. =
The=20
> BTS has a report (rated "minor") 250528 that describes this problem. The=
re=20
> is no indication in that bug report that the bug is fixed.
In that case I'll close this installation report since the only real bug
in it is already filed.
--=20
see shy jo
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBasoxd8HHehbQuO8RAv6HAKDmXe3JzLHsVNfzGnWf8DkB0T9WOACbBwhr
7oKWqZ6ShCXsue49RufxJvY=
=vq36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
