* Christian Perrier [2004-09-01 17:20:11+0200] > > > I've tested them here and seems fine to me. Christian, could you also > > give it a try? As I stated in the code (FIXME comment) I couldn't > > manage to find a better solution, maybe Joey suggests a more legal > > solution for the problem. > > Recai, thanks a lot for working on this. I use this occasion for > granting the work you're doing on these i18n issues : your help has > been and is still considerable.
Thanks for your comments :-) > I'm quite busy currently at work so I have far less time than earlier > weeks. > > As a consequence, I'm not really sure that I will have time for > testing. I'll try but I first want to work again on daily images > validation for French (which I've stopped since RC1). > > IMHO, the change is quite invasive and, then, probably risky before > RC2. This means we will probably have to live with 268815 for RC2 > unless I am wrong and the change is indeed not dangerous. IMO, the change is not so invasive as it appears. The patch for the countrychooser does only a simple code move and it is perfectly possible to ignore it at all, at the expense of using a somewhat ugly call as '/var/lib/dpkg/info/countrychooser.postinst'. The critical code is in the languagechooser patch, but I think it should be a safe change, because I deliberately put the code in a '(...) || true' block, so that a failure case does not stuck the installation. (Maybe we should change it as e.g. '(...) || { log "failure to reselect language }') > I'm confident in the quality of your patches, Recai, that's not really > the problem. Indeed, they're probably more robust than most of things > I've coded myself. However, changing things now is maybe not the > safest option. > > 268815 is, imho, not that grave as the situation where the user > changes the language during the install is quite unlikely. Yes, I agree, it's not so serious. > I'm waiting for others input on this topic, of course.... > > And, anyway, I'll make my best for testing the proposed patch. > > In the more long future, we probably have to consider merging again > languagechooser and countrychooser together : both are working too > closely and making countrychooser a separate package may have been a > bad design choice (this was mine..:-)). > > I imagine this to happen only after sarge release, however. Right. We should merge them in future. -- roktas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature