John Summerfield wrote:

Sven Luther wrote:

fwiw I noticed something very like this between 2.2 and 2.4 when 2.4 was new: 2.2 was faster on my Pentium system. I think it was a earlier version of the same chipset.

Here are results on 2.6.7-1-k7:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  108 MB in  3.02 seconds =  35.78 MB/sec

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered disk reads:  120 MB in  3.01 seconds =  39.93 MB/sec
kowari:/etc#

Both drives are WD120 Gb (different models), hdg is on an Abit hotrod66 (promise chips).


And how much you would get in 2.4 ?


Sorry.

kowari:~# hdparm -t /dev/hd{a,g}{,}

/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  152 MB in  3.02 seconds =  50.33 MB/sec
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  152 MB in  3.02 seconds =  50.33 MB/sec

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered disk reads:  120 MB in  3.02 seconds =  39.74 MB/sec

/dev/hdg: Timing buffered disk reads: 120 MB in 3.00 seconds = 40.00 MB/sec
kowari:~# uname -r
2.4.26-1-k7
kowari:~#


I have further results, and I've just filed a bug report (confirmation not in yet so no no).
kowari:~# hdparm -t /dev/hd{a,g}{,}


/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  112 MB in  3.05 seconds =  36.73 MB/sec

/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads:  110 MB in  3.00 seconds =  36.64 MB/sec

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered disk reads:  118 MB in  3.01 seconds =  39.21 MB/sec

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered disk reads:  120 MB in  3.01 seconds =  39.83 MB/sec
kowari:~# uname -r
2.6.8-1-k7
kowari:~#


It's a self-built kernel, but without modification.

I neglected to include a modules listing in the bug report. Here are those myst likely to be involved:
ide_generic 1472 0
sis5513 16776 1
hpt366 22788 2
ide_disk 19264 5 hpt366
ide_core 138776 5 usb_storage,ide_generic,sis5513,hpt366,ide_disk
sd_mod 21632 0
ata_piix 8132 0
libata 41348 1 ata_piix
scsi_mod 124620 3 usb_storage,sd_mod,libata
unix 28592 170


--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/


-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to