> > Based on discussions on the debian-kernel list[1], I'd like to propose > > that we use 2.4.27 as the 2.4 kernel for all architectures with 2.4 kernels > > in sarge. The strongest arguments for 2.4.27, as opposed to 2.4.26 were noted > > by tbm [3]. > > One thing to bear in mind when making this kind of decision it that it > seems to take d-i about 2 weeks to transition to a new kernel once the
What are the plans regarding 2.6 ? Yesterday, I installed a HP Proliant DL240, with Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet controllers....2.6.7 tg3 module does not seem to support these while I've been told that 2.6.8 does. So, at least regarding such (quite widespread?) machines, I would support the use of 2.6.8. PS : this machine installed well with 2.4.26, however, so I'm later able to switch to 2.6.8 by just waiting it to enter sarge. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
