On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:42:46PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:52:20AM +1000, James Mills wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > [Please keep further questions on the mailing list, if you would.] > > > > > > Shit. Does this list not have an explicit Reply-To header to the mailing > > > list address either ? THis is the 2nd list I've come across that is > > > configured this way. My apolagies. > > > > No Debian lists have that; deliberately so. > > Details? > > If it's deliberate, there must be something that breaks with an explicit > "Reply-To" header worse than not having such a header breaks old > mailers.
Google for "Reply-To considered harmful". (There are arguments the other way round, too; it's a notorious divisive issue that is *really* not worth rehashing here yet again.) Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
