Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2004 16:04:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 09:04:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from keg.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.4] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BolUV-0000JI-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:04:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by keg.cs.vu.nl with esmtp
(Smail #91) id m1BolUT-00020EC; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:04 +0200
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: install report: amd64 works ok
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040724 daily build from
debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images
uname -a: Linux carrington 2.6.7-5-amd64-xeon #1 SMP Thu Jul 15 00:27:37 CEST 2004
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: 20040725
Method: A netboot install from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/. No proxy.
Machine: Homebrew based on an Asus K8V SE deluxe mobo
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: hde6
Root Size/partition table:
hde1 ntfs 40G win xp
hde3 ext3 20G debian i386
hde4 ext3 4G debian i386
hde6 ext3 4G debian amd64 /
hde5 lvm 125G
1 music xfs 60G
2 home xfs 45G /home
3 opt xfs 10G /chroot
4 swap swap
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
The install went ok. There are two points I do want to note however.
First, the windows partition wasn't detected by os-prober. A previous
install with a i386 d-i image did find it. Most likely caused by the
ntfs module being absent.
Second, although I have an AMD cpu d-i installed an Intel Xeon kernel-image.
It does boot and seems to be working good enough to install an k8
kernel-image.
In the logs I found a note that the installer didn't know what the amd64
architecture was and it looked like it just defaulted to the first
non-netboot kernel it could find.
regards,
Thomas
--
Human civilization is not something achieved against nature; it is
rather the outcome of the working of the innate qualities of man.
-- Ludwig von Mises
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261371-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 21:36:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 14:36:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bqf3J-0000dJ-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:36:33 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7552A18536
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5670882CEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:14 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm closing this report as the two issues found have been cloned out as
separate bugs.
--=20
see shy jo
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBCr2qd8HHehbQuO8RAhg4AKCZMnhSvqqg2dsCAowIVt97srx+EACffy4I
+xlslyaCljsM87BBySiPSeE=
=kwy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
