Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260655: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails 
for ./README.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 15:10:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 21 08:10:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (bad.dynu.ca) [132.216.183.27] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BnIk3-0003Bk-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:10:47 -0700
Received: by bad.dynu.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 38CED278039; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for ./README.html
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:10:17 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor

Mounting the sarge netinst beta 4 .iso (on loopback), cd'ing to that dir, and running:

         md5sum -c md5sums.txt

Gives an error. README.html has the wrong md5sum... assumably because it was
edited after the checksums were generated.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260655-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 18:33:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 21 11:33:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (dragon.kitenet.net) [66.168.94.147] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BnLub-0001CJ-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:33:53 -0700
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 31DDC6E8C4; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#260655: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for 
./README.html
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Debian User wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: minor
>=20
> Mounting the sarge netinst beta 4 .iso (on loopback), cd'ing to that dir,=
 and running:
>=20
>        md5sum -c md5sums.txt
>=20
> Gives an error. README.html has the wrong md5sum... assumably because it =
was
> edited after the checksums were generated.

beta4 is rather old. This is fixed in the daily builds.

--=20
see shy jo

--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA/qZ+d8HHehbQuO8RAr9wAJ0eSmiNHxl3jfNFYRLYBspg6mHL7QCfTNde
MKbII4F7lddB40kxlscRf8E=
=Cbda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to