On Wed, 2004-07-07, at 23:56:08 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:19:39AM +0200, Anders Lennartsson wrote: > > drive. I have not tested to continue the install from there. > > I'm not a SATA export, but AFAIK this is normal and expected. I agree. Although I kind of expected this kernel to recognize the disk as SCSI as the Debian 2.4.26 does include the libata patch. Perhaps 2.4.27 will sort this out.
snip > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: PCI: Enabling device 00:1f.1 (0005 -> > > 0007) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5: not 100% native mode: will probe > > irqs later > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfc00-0xfc07, BIOS > > settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfc08-0xfc0f, BIOS > > settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: IDE controller at PCI slot > > 00:1f.2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: 100% native mode on irq 5 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide2: BM-DMA at 0xef90-0xef97, BIOS > > settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide3: BM-DMA at 0xef98-0xef9f, BIOS > > settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: IDE controller at PCI slot > > 03:0c.0 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will > > probe irqs later > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: ROM enabled at 0xf7ee0000 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide4: BM-DMA at 0xdf60-0xdf67, BIOS > > settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide5: BM-DMA at 0xdf68-0xdf6f, BIOS > > settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdc: PLEXTOR CD-R PREMIUM, ATAPI > > CD/DVD-ROM drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hde: ST3160023AS, ATA DISK drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: blk: queue f885bba8, I/O limit 4095Mb > > (mask 0xffffffff) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdi: IC35L060AVVA07-0, ATA DISK drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: blk: queue f885c450, I/O limit 4095Mb > > (mask 0xffffffff) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide2 at 0xefe0-0xefe7,0xefae on irq 5 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide4 at 0xdf98-0xdf9f,0xdf96 on irq 7 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hde: attached ide-disk driver. > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: hde: 312581808 sectors (160042 MB) > > w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=19457/255/63, UDMA(33) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdi: attached ide-disk driver. > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: hdi: 120103200 sectors (61493 MB) > > w/1863KiB Cache, CHS=119150/16/63, UDMA(100) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: Partition check: > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: [PTBL] [781/128/63] p1 p2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: p5 > > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: [PTBL] [7476/255/63] p1 > > > > Well, what the kernel is expected to do depends on the source and > > configuration, niether of which I have checked for this particular > > kernel. > So, no bug with 2.4, you just didn't try any further. Correct? Correct. > > >From the 2.6 hardware-summary: > > > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ata_piix;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB (ICH5) Serial > > ATA 150 Storage Controller; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ide-scsi;;;Linux;IDE-SCSI emulation layer; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;IC35L060AVVA07-0;/dev/hde > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;eUSB;Compact Flash;/dev/sda > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;eUSB;SD-MS-SM;/dev/sdb > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;ATA;ST3160023AS;/dev/sdc > > error: /bin/report-hw: Unable to find lspci. > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: Module Size Used by Not tainted > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: ata_piix 7940 3 > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: libata 36480 1 ata_piix,[permanent] > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: xfs 513720 0 > > > > Note: The lsmod lines with ata_piix related modules are only there > > after manually modprobing ata_piix, but the ata_piix;;;Intel ... line > > is there both before and after the module loading. > > This is very strange. It seems that hw-detect does not load the module > allthough discover recognises it and it seems to be there. > > Are you sure you waited until the third hardware detection run before > you manually loaded the module. The module may not be available during > the first and second run of hw-detect. I waited until I came into the partitioner. That should be the outmost limit, if the disk isn't recognized at that time your'e out of luck. I then backed out of the partitioner and saved the logs to floppy, and then executed a shell, copied the logs to a directory on the floppy, and then manually loaded the module. Exit from the shell and then into the partitioner. Violá, there was the disk. Succesfully partitioned the disk. Then saved new logs. Anders
