On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:30:47 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: >tags 255077 + moreinfo unreproducible >thanks > >On Friday 18 June 2004 18:42, Herbert Kaminski wrote: >> Kernel 2.6.6 was selected, but 2.4.25 was installed, >> so in stage 2 no module was found, networking failed, >> installation could not finish. > >Hello Herbert, > >Several people have tried to reproduce this bug using the exact same image you >used at medium priority. All ended up with 2.6.6 correctly installed, >including the modules. > >Could you try to reproduce the bug yourself and tell us exactly how? >It could be useful if you would first check your download using the md5sum on >http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040616/.
Sorry, it was my fault, and I was able to reproduce it with sarge_d-i. As this notebook had WinXP, Win98, an old SuSE and a previous d-i test installed, I did not replace the boot loader with grub but kept the old one. It was lilo, so I should have run lilo from Suse. Creating a new ext3 file system apparently did not destroy the kernel from the old d-i test months ago, that was a 2.4.25. After updating lilo, the installation finished flawlessly. Sorry for the noise. Herbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
