Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:36:51 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closeing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2003 13:02:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 09 08:01:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A7aQV-0002LX-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:01:55 -0500
Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31])
 by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:58:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from relay.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.1])
        by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu,
 09 Oct 2003 14:58:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de
 (mx.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.4])      by relay.rwth-aachen.de
 (8.12.10/8.12.7-1) with SMTP id h99Cw2sU016380 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:58:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 16343 invoked by alias); Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:58:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 16331 invoked from network); Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:58:02 +0000
Received: from coyote.mmweg (134.130.118.117) by hub.mmweg with SMTP; Thu,
 09 Oct 2003 12:58:02 +0000
Received: from sl by coyote.mmweg with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1A7aMj-0001En-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:58:02 +0200
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:58:01 +0200
From: Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cdebconf-newt-udeb: OK button misleading in certain select questions
Sender: Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: cdebconf-newt-udeb
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

I don't know if it is a problem with the german translation "Weiter" for
the OK button, but since two of my (german) friends ran into this usability
issue I believe it is worth reporting.

In partitioner and partconf you have a select question generating some
kind of menu, together with a "Finish" entry. However it turned out that
people believed that the "Weiter" button would have the meaning of the
Finish button. They selected "Weiter" but the select question was still
pointing at some other entry than "Finish" and they were confused about
the result.

I'd propose to drop the "Ok" button entirely in select questions,
because it makes no sense having it there anyway.

Regards,
Sebastian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux coyote 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214935-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2004 17:37:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 30 10:37:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BUUFQ-0002ro-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 10:37:24 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [200.96.126.218])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BF8188B2
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 May 2004 17:37:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 665F36E0C2; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:36:51 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 14:36:51 -0300
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closeing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We got rid of the button, so closing this bug.

--=20
see shy jo

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFAuhuzd8HHehbQuO8RAvvpAKDGYHQV0TR/x2ahwFgiaZs4ZNIWiwCYsljB
wQx1RsR3VLhp92M+QKBbCw==
=qHSg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to