Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2004 11:53:58 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line beta2 Sarge Installer Failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 18:22:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 31 10:22:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 12-221-178-131.client.insightbb.com (localhost.localdomain)
[12.221.178.131]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmzlU-0003IA-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:22:44 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (zurg [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0VIMhDl005047
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:22:43 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0VIMhUI005045
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:22:43 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: samurai set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Subject: beta2 Sarge Installer Failure
From: Sam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:22:42 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: January 31, 2004 (unstable)
uname -a: Linux zurg 2.4.24 #2 Sat Jan 24 09:23:56 CST 2004 i686 athlon
i386 GNU/Linux
Date: 10:27 cst us, January 31, 2004
Method:
Tried the unstable beta2 version of the new installer
to install a debian sarge install on my primary home system.
Machine: homebuilt desktop
Processor: amd 1800+xp
Memory: 512mbytes
Root Device: ide, root device is /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
major minor #blocks name
3 0 78150744 hda Primary hard drive
3 1 313236 hda1 Fedora Core /boot
3 2 15358140 hda2 Fedora Core /
3 3 30716280 hda3 Data Storage
3 4 1 hda4
3 5 15358108 hda5 Home directories
3 6 15358108 hda6 Proposed Debian Root <<<<<<< TARGET
3 7 1044193 hda7 swap space
3 64 39121488 hdb Secondary (slave Drive)
3 65 104391 hdb1
3 66 514080 hdb2
3 67 30531532 hdb3
3 68 7968240 hdb4
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 746 Host (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SG86C202
00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 85C503/5513 (rev
25)
00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE]
00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0
Controller (rev 0f)
00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0
Controller (rev 0f)
00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0
Controller
00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900
10/100 Ethernet (rev 91)
00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev
0a)
00:0a.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port
(rev 0a)
00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2
MX/MX 400] (rev b2)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I tried both the beta2 release from a few weeks ago then the unstable
beta2 installer released yesterday. Both had the same problem. This
report is about the unstable version.
I get all the way through the install process up to roughly 58% where it
begins to configure everything. I then receive an error. In the messages
file I see the following information:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error data <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Setting up sysvinit (2.85-9)
sysvinit: creating /dev/initctl
init: timeout opening / writing control channel /dev/initctl
setting up modutils (2.4.26-1)
errors were encountered while processing
tar
umount: /target/dev/shm: no such file
umount: /target/proc/bus/shm invalid argument
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end error data <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
The processes gives me a message on the console to the effect that I
have encountered a problem please check the logs.... I can still
interact with the installer, but I can get no further in the install
process.
To recap: I'm attempting to use the unstable, beta2 installer to install
debian on partition /dev/hda6. The would effectively make the system
capable of being a dual boot machine. I don't know if there is a
partition issue where the installation must occur on a primary partition
or not.....
--
Sam Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
Lost a planet, Master ObiWan has...............
How embarassing ....................
************************************************************************
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230540-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 14:57:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 07:57:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTMK3-0001AB-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:57:31 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id A82AE64D3F; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:57:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 96CAD10038; Thu, 27 May 2004 11:53:58 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:53:58 -0300
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: beta2 Sarge Installer Failure
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
* Sam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-26 23:02]:
> Thanks for the response. I haven't seen the problem with the newer
> versions of the beta installer....
Great.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
