Your message dated Thu, 20 May 2004 21:47:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dropping BOOTP & DHCP ???? no!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2004 12:09:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 20 05:09:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BQmMK-0003fY-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 05:09:12 -0700
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B77F51800; Thu, 20 May 2004 14:08:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:08:57 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is there RARP support
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
package: debian-installer-manual
severity: minor
The manual of debian-installer tells, there is RARP support for
many architectures, however I doubt it[1]. This bugreport
and his siblings should help to find if it really is.
(this bugreport, BR, will be cloned for the various archs)
This BR could look like a hardware specific question,
or a question about the various BOOT ROMS.
The Debian related question is about the kernels that are
provided, they should have RARP support.
Computers that do a netboot will ask twice for an IP-address,
once from the BOOT ROM and once by the kernel.
(first one loads the kernel, the second gets the next part
(RAM disk or NFS root))
So the question is, Does the kernel for the arch has RARP support?
If even the sparc kernels[2] don't have RARP, I would also like to known.
BTW: I known that I'm enforcing dropping the support for RARP.
But hey, there are alternatives (BOOTP & DHCP)
and it means a smaller kernel.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
[1] RARP is deprecated by BOOTP ( and DHCP )
[2] (old) Sun hardware does use RARP to get a IP address
--=20
stappers says hi to ths :-)
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFArJ/ZOSINbgwa/7sRAkNEAKDLJDdNwwkDZghLu2h+aknjUX1M8wCfQddh
FFTdJfqlefh/1iNwlAuK1qw=
=JGCM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250009-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2004 19:47:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 20 12:47:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BQtW6-0000L9-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:47:46 -0700
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9981C1800; Thu, 20 May 2004 21:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:47:31 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dropping BOOTP & DHCP ???? no!
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GeONROBiaq1zPAtT"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--GeONROBiaq1zPAtT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry.
I was too quick with the closing.
And I was too quick with the reopening.
I had this patch in mind:
Index: installer/doc/manual/build/buildone.sh
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
--- installer/doc/manual/build/buildone.sh (revision 15923)
+++ installer/doc/manual/build/buildone.sh (working copy)
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
kernelversion=3D"2.4.24"
=09
fdisk=3D"fdisk.txt"
- network=3D"supports-tftp;supports-rarp;supports-dhcp;supports-boot=
p;supports-nfsroot"
+ network=3D"supports-tftp;supports-rarp;supports-nfsroot"
boot=3D"supports-floppy-boot"
other=3D"supports-serial-console;rescue-needs-root-disk"
smp=3D"supports-smp"
but BOOTP & DHCP does make sense for d-i, it is done in userland.
Closing this bug again.
Sorry for the noise
Geert Stappers
--=20
You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs.
--GeONROBiaq1zPAtT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFArQtTOSINbgwa/7sRAnwfAJ0SZa4Uf3yKqxGmP+5T9Bu3/0sTHgCdEHgV
JpFm9DEowAGZ2JGYfH4jkIU=
=P/7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GeONROBiaq1zPAtT--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
