On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 07:29:55AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > This is plain wrong, my opinion is that we do not have to get stuck to > > This is not "plain wrong", Denis. This is a proof that we > disagree..:-)
You wrote in your previous mail: CP> Finding an internationnaly recognised standard for these highly CP> sensitive topics such as country names is *very* difficult. Up to now, CP> I'm still convinced that the less bad list is iso-3166 (Denis Barbier CP> proposal is also the use of iso-3166 as ICU codes are officially CP> announced to use iso-3166). I feel enough qualified to tell that my proposal does not promote the use of ISO 3166, any list can be used instead if it better fits countrychooser needs. > By the way, this is also a proof that though we disagree we appreciate > each other's work anyway. > > > a standard; maintainers are solely responsible to their packages, and > > if some people dislike these choices, they can fork it. > > So, if I hear you properly, you suggest that anyone disliking the > current way Debian Installer deals with these issues forks its own > version of d-i? Sure, how do you want to prevent that? But there is another option: one might also only fork countrychooser ;) Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
