Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:50:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 10:57:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 15 03:57:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BE4Yu-0008T8-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 03:57:40 -0700
Received: (qmail 6469 invoked by uid 65534); 15 Apr 2004 10:57:08 -0000
Received: from pD95196A8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO hartelt.net) (217.81.150.168)
by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 12:57:08 +0200
X-Authenticated: #118558
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:57:07 +0200
From: Alexander Hartelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package: installation-reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 3 from http://www.de.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Linux notebook 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2004-04-14 16:33 UTC
Method: Installation with two floppy images (boot.img and root.img) from an usb floppy
drice?
Network installation from ftp.freenet.de, no proxy>
Machine: Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook C1020, 20GB HD, 640MB Ram, USB Floppy drive
Processor: 1500 MHZ Intel Celeron
Memory: 640 MB
Root Device: IDE, first drive, first Partition
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Error during the installation of the base system. Error Message (I will try to
translate it from german):
debootstrap exited with error 1
("debootstrap wurde mit einem Fehler beendet (zurückgegebener Wert 1)")
in /var/log/messages there are several errors. I think, the most important is:
"dpkg: error processsing libpam-runtime (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1"
All other packages which require libpam-runtime are also failing because of this error.
After this installation, I downloaded the installation-cd with the base
system, which works.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 243881-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 04:50:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 19 21:50:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BFnDC-0001CF-00; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:50:22 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial236.pm3bloun2.bloun.naxs.com [216.98.69.236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C20C18127
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:50:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2B5AC6E901; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:50:17 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This was caused by a problem with the libpam-runtime package, since
fixed.
--=20
see shy jo
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAhKwId8HHehbQuO8RAtUjAJ4o2jWmn7q8DkiKqlwEpvb82lUphQCfa3ft
pF9G4S+1OwejS3Sehf9IWZs=
=6zJr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
