On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:15:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Mar 30, 2004, at 01:20, Sven Luther wrote: > > > >I have a fear suspision that this may be more related to newworld, than > >the oldworld stuff needed for miboot, which may probably be varying > >between the different models we may need to support. > > <gasp> That's the boot block people are arguing about? That is > definitely valid for oldworld; it was written before 1994. (The web > site says '96, but I have a copy on my Inside Mac CD from 1994.) > > With "Generally, however, the boot code stored on disk is ignored in > favor of boot code stored in a resource in the System file." do you > even need those bytes after it?
No idea, but i don't have access to hardware to test. That said, since miboot is replacing this System file, it only displaces the problem, i believe. And for the other mail : Well, if it was only that, binutils-multiarch should work out just fine, no ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
