Your message dated Sat, 03 Apr 2004 09:53:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line should provide discover-udeb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2004 02:25:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 23 18:25:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B5y5a-0003Vh-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:25:54 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-32.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671BB17EF8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 02:25:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 472C56F11C; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:25:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:25:05 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: should provide discover-udeb
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.53
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: discover1-udeb
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
hw-detect depends on discover-udeb, so I think that discover1-udeb
should provide it. Currently the d-i initrd build process downloads
discover-udeb, but does not put it in the initrd, and in the initrd,
hw-detects dependency is unsatisfied.
It might be better if discover 1 and 2 udebs both provided a third name,
like discover, then hw-detect could depend on that.
--=20
see shy jo
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYPGBd8HHehbQuO8RAoQBAJ9nH99u/d2SXFNsf4KjpayvTeaUfQCgqNtm
A22S3Oi+W+xlxq418n66qKk=
=cdZw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 239725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 07:53:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 23:53:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 217-13-7-10.dd.nextgentel.com (minerva.hungry.com) [217.13.7.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9fyP-0003KY-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 23:53:50 -0800
Received: from pere by minerva.hungry.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B9fxr-00037s-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 09:53:15 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: should provide discover-udeb
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 09:53:15 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
The package control file now reads
Package: discover1-udeb
Section: debian-installer
Priority: extra
Architecture: any
Provides: discover
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, discover1-data-udeb
Description: hardware identification library (udeb)
Checking the changelog, I see that the fix was included in version
1.5-7. This problem is fixed. Closing the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
