On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:11:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > This would be a good solution. What about the later Apple licence ? > > > > If we can get it under the MIT/X11 license it doesn't matter what other > > licenses it's under. The MIT/X11 license is non-exclusive. > > Well, i ask, because apple may be more inclined to use a licence they > have experience with.
2-clause BSD, as used by the NetBSD Foundation, would be good, too. -- G. Branden Robinson | We either learn from history or, Debian GNU/Linux | uh, well, something bad will [EMAIL PROTECTED] | happen. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bob Church
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
