Your message dated Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:29:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cloing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2004 14:31:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 16 06:31:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus.cay.oan.es [193.146.252.17]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Asjml-0002Ju-00; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:31:48 -0800
Received: from polifemo.cay.oan.es ([193.146.252.30] ident=vicente)
by zeus.cay.oan.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Asjm9-0005y7-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:31:10 +0100
From: Pablo de Vicente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Observatorio Astronomico Nacional
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sarge installer did not finish on a Dell PowerEdge 1750
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:30:31 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 13-02-2004. I got it from people.debian.org/cdima=
ge/
testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.22-1
Date: 13-02-2004
Method: I burned a CD and booted from it.
Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1750, with only one processor, but may need a SMP
kernel
Processor: Xeon
Memory: 1 Gb
Root Device: /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0
Root Size/partition table: I kept the table from RedHat 9 which came=20
preinstalled with this host.
Dell utility
Linux LVM
ext2 /boot
ext3 /usr
Linux LVM /home
ext3 /var
ext3 /tmp
ext3 /
swap
Output of lspci: None. It does not work on a second shell
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [ E] ---- crashed here ------
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I got an error which advised me to hava look at debootstrap.log, so I opene=
d a=20
second shell and looked at it. This is what I saw:
mount: relocation errro: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: symbol __libc.stack_end, vers=
ion=20
GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file ld-linux.so with link time reference
debootstrap finished with error
thanks,
Pablo de Vicente
=2D --=20
____________________________________________________________
Pablo de Vicente, http://www.oan.es, OAN Spain
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAMNQHSItUpHl6kJERAmiJAKD/NuZHaFXAhPlHwMBVTV836jEe5gCeMOSb
AzXXGvU9RmpuAEJhHHMXKKo=3D
=3Du1WQ
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 233046-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 05:30:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 01 21:30:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9HFr-00075z-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:30:11 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-94-109.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.109])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D0518020
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 05:30:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B88526F1CF; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:29:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:29:42 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cloing old bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Whatever this bug was (and I don't know what it was), it does not seem
to be present in beta 3 of the debian installer.
--=20
see shy jo
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbPpGd8HHehbQuO8RAtd/AKDNtng3fN1eL3kMjybstFkW45J9GwCgzhiJ
NBkJLe82e4F9c71+4nlqfNo=
=94tl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
