> whatever), devfs, and in the back of most people's minds, standard /dev > naming. That's bad enough, but grub-installer adds to this grub's own > naming. So I was suprised to notice that grub-install accepts /dev/ > filenames. Is there some reason to not use them by default?
whoa! that would have saved me a large amount of trouble the other day - wanted to use grub on a machine, but couldn't quite get it working. i guess this would have fixed it. maybe someone should confer with the grub upstream and ask if that's a feature that can be expected to continue to exist? --elijah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
