[Petter Reinholdtsen]n > These are the package names including changes, if I got it right:
I got a minor issue wrong. > source discover2-data -> discover-data (changed, new name exited) > binary discover-data (new source) > binary discover-data-udeb discover-data-udeb (unchanged) discover-data-udeb should be discover2-data-udeb, of course. The renaming was discussed on #debian-boot today, and Bdale Garbee didn't like the inconsistent naming of udebs. If Joey Hess is ok with renaming the discover 1 udebs, we can make consistent naming of the udebs. We will then end up with this name list: type old name new name delta ------------------------------------------------------------------------- source discover -> discover1 (NEW) binary discover -> discover1 (NEW) binary libdiscover1 libdiscover1 (unchanged) binary libdiscover-dev -> libdiscover1-dev (NEW) binary libdiscover1-pic libdiscover1-pic (unchanged) binary discover-udeb -> discover1-udeb (NEW) source discover-data -> discover1-data (NEW) binary discover-data -> discover1-data (NEW) binary dicsover-data-udeb discover1-data-udeb (NEW) source discover2 -> discover (changed, new name existed) binary discover (new source) binary libdiscover2 (NEW) binary libdiscover-dev (new source) binary discover2-udeb discover-udeb (changed, new name existed) source discover2-data -> discover-data (changed, new name existed) binary discover-data (new source) binary discover2-data-udeb -> discover-data-udeb (changed, new name existed) So, Joey, should we rename the udebs and update the build scripts, to avoid having inconsistent naming between the debs and the udebs? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
