Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:17:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done long ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2003 17:34:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 06 12:34:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bast.u.arizona.edu [128.196.133.225]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A6ZFd-0008TA-00; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 12:34:29 -0500
Received: from bast.u.arizona.edu (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by bast.u.arizona.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h96HYSYQ009558
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:34:28 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bast.u.arizona.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id h96HYQ7t009555
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:34:26 -0700 (MST)
X-Authentication-Warning: bast.u.arizona.edu: andrel owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:34:26 -0700 (MST)
From: Andre Lehovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer: should suggest a sane default kernel
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: install
Version: N/A, jigdo image of 3 Oct 2003
The kernel installer still needs some UI work. In
particular, it should suggest a sane default kernel.
Currently the first kernel presented is
kernel-image-2.6.0-test4-1-386 which is almost surely the
wrong choice.
Could the installer detect the number and type of CPUs and
use that to suggest the default? Something like "Here are
all the available kernels. Based on your detected hardware
configuration the best choice appears to be 2.4-386".
(I realize that UMP vs SMP is an important difference. But
do all the 686, K6, K7 kernels really result in noticeable
peformance differences?)
--Andre
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214441-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 04:17:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 20:17:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B361T-0000Re-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:17:47 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial174.pm3bloun1.bloun.naxs.com [216.98.69.174])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0979717DFC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:17:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8FCC76E118; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:17:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:17:08 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done long ago
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
base-installer has chosen smp kernels on i386 by the method arrived at
by this bug's thread for a long time.
--=20
see shy jo
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAVn/Ed8HHehbQuO8RAlYsAKCBWZ45tnv4fasmfG8BaCte8uc8OwCgiBne
hbrNNjb/LXtLJt12r074jc8=
=Z9fQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
